What represents the two pillars of scientific research?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Enhance your preparation for UCF COM3311 Communication Research Methods Exam. Immerse in multiple choice questions; each accompanied with hints and detailed explanations. Assess your comprehension and boost your confidence for success!

The two pillars of scientific research are best represented by logic and observation. Logic provides the framework for reasoning, allowing researchers to construct theories, develop hypotheses, and derive conclusions based on structured thinking. Observation, on the other hand, involves the systematic collection of data through empirical means, ensuring that findings are grounded in real-world evidence. Together, these elements enable researchers to formulate valid arguments and test their propositions effectively, thus advancing scientific knowledge.

While options involving hypothesis and experimentation, data and theory, or observation and technology are relevant to the scientific process, they do not encapsulate the foundational reasoning and empirical foundation that logic and observation represent. Logic addresses the analytical and deductive aspects of research, while observation ensures that scientific inquiries are based on measurable and observable phenomena. This combination is essential for rigorous scientific inquiry.