What principle in research ethics helps in managing participant expectations after the study?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Enhance your preparation for UCF COM3311 Communication Research Methods Exam. Immerse in multiple choice questions; each accompanied with hints and detailed explanations. Assess your comprehension and boost your confidence for success!

Debriefing is a key principle in research ethics that serves to manage participant expectations after the completion of a study. This process involves providing participants with comprehensive information about the study, particularly about its purpose, methods, and any deception that may have been involved. Debriefing is essential because it helps clarify any misunderstandings or discomfort that may have arisen during the study, allowing participants to fully understand their contributions and the implications of their participation.

Through debriefing, researchers can provide participants with insights into how their data will be used and the potential outcomes of the research. This fulfills ethical obligations regarding transparency and respect for participants, helping to alleviate any lingering feelings of confusion or concern. Additionally, it reinforces the value of participants' contributions by acknowledging their role in advancing knowledge.

In contrast, informed consent focuses on ensuring that participants are fully aware of the study's risks and benefits before participation occurs. Voluntary participation emphasizes that individuals should have the freedom to choose whether to take part in research without any coercion. The principle of "do no harm" underlines the commitment to protecting participants from physical or psychological harm, but it does not specifically address how participants are managed post-study. Thus, debriefing is the most relevant principle for managing expectations and