What does it mean to have "illogical reasoning" in the context of research?

Having "illogical reasoning" in the context of research primarily entails ignoring contradictions in findings. This means that a researcher may overlook or dismiss contradictory evidence or alternative interpretations that do not support their hypothesis or expected outcomes. Engaging in illogical reasoning can compromise the integrity and credibility of research, as it creates a biased perspective that does not account for all relevant data. A key aspect of rigorous research methodology is the critical evaluation of all evidence, even if it contradicts the initial hypothesis. By accepting only supporting evidence and ignoring contradictions, researchers can fail to provide a comprehensive analysis of the topic at hand. This undermines the objective of research, which is to seek truth and understanding through systematic inquiry and reflection on all available data.